Transparency alternatives to Zilliz
Other Search and vector infrastructure vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Zilliz. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Zilliz on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Zilliz has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Zilliz” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Zilliz | Found at Zilliz, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromatrychroma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chroma | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Parallelparallel.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Parallel | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Pineconepinecone.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pinecone | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Vectaravectara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectara | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Addsearchaddsearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Addsearch | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Constructorconstructor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Constructor | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Gleanglean.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glean | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Hebbiahebbia.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hebbia | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Voyage AIvoyageai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Voyage AI | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Vespavespa.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vespa | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Dashworksdashworks.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Dashworks | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Doofinderdoofinder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doofinder | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.