Transparency alternatives to Parallel
Other Search and vector infrastructure vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Parallel. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Parallel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Parallel has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Parallel” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Parallel | Found at Parallel, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromatrychroma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chroma | 74/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Pineconepinecone.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pinecone | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Coveocoveo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coveo | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Gleanglean.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glean | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Vespavespa.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vespa | 35/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Zillizzilliz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zilliz | 22/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Vectaravectara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectara | 61/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hebbiahebbia.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hebbia | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Dashworksdashworks.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Dashworks | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Valyuvalyu.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Valyu | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cludocludo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cludo | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Metalgetmetal.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Metal | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.