SaaS Ranking
Menu

Trackforce

trackforce.com · Security guard workforce · checked 2026-09-13

65/100CBand C

Rank 1 of 18 in Security guard workforce, where the median is 9.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for Trackforce on 2026-09-13. We found 8 with a source and did not find 4 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 65 out of 100, band C.

Overview

0 days since the newest finding, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Trackforce

trackforce.com · Security guard workforce

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
C 65of 100 Rank 1 of 18

Published commitments7 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-13. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Trackforce has no such document.

Where Trackforce sits in Security guard workforce

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C2 11%
  4. D0 0%
  5. E3 17%
  6. F13 72%
18 vendors with a score; 1 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Trackforce is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What they state

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-13.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://trackforce.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://trackforce.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://trackforce.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://trackforce.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://trackforce.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://trackforce.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://trackforce.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-09-13.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://trackforce.com/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://trackforce.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://trackforce.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://trackforce.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://trackforce.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-13.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://trackforce.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: app.qualified.com, cdn-cookieyes.com, cdn.usefathom.com, cdn.weglot.com, js.qualified.com, log.cookieyes.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-13.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://trackforce.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 8
✓

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.trackforce.com/legal/data-processing-addendum/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Canada.
    Show the exact wording

    ISO 27001 & 27017 Information & cloud security NIST 800-171 Compliance GDPR EU data protection Data residency US · Canada · EU CPCSC Level 1 Canadian cyber security cert Real outcomes When seconds mat...

    Read at https://www.trackforce.com/

Source: https://www.trackforce.com/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.trackforce.com/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age= 31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://trackforce.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains.
    Show the exact wording

    max-age= 31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://trackforce.com/

Source: https://trackforce.com/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://www.trackforce.com/legal/data-processing-addendum/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II (unclear from the sentence). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 3 exact wordings

    ED GUIDE Hospital Workplace Violence Prevention: 2026 Evidence Brief View Case Study Compliance ADP ISO 27001 NIST GDPR See TrackTik in action.

    Read at https://www.trackforce.com/

    40+ years 50+ countries SOC2 GDPR ISO About Trackforce Company About Trackforce Careers Conferences & Events Contact us News & M

    Read at https://www.trackforce.com/

    rol Marcus Cole · 2 hours ago Track Riverside Corporate Park / Lobby Priya Nair · 3 hours ago Track SOC 2 Type II Security attestation ISO 27001 & 27017 Information & cloud security NIST 800-171 Compl...

    Read at https://www.trackforce.com/

Source: https://www.trackforce.com/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.5 %.
    Show the exact wording

    Client that the Services will be fully operational and shall be available to Clients not less than 99.5% of the time in any thirty (30) day period (each occurrence of unavailability is referred to as....

    Read at https://www.trackforce.com/legal/support-level-agreement/

Source: https://www.trackforce.com/legal/support-level-agreement/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.trackforce.com/legal/privacy-policy-uk/ · checked 2026-09-13

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.