Alternatives to Blumira
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Blumira does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Blumira on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Blumira has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Blumira does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Blumira does not | Blumira publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expelexpel.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Huntresshuntress.com | 57/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Pantherpanther.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Corelightcorelight.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Red Canaryredcanary.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Vectra AIvectra.ai | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Filigranfiligran.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Gigamongigamon.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Corocoro.net | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Arctic Wolfarcticwolf.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Todyltodyl.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.