Transparency alternatives to Ontinue
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ontinue does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Ontinue on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ontinue has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Ontinue does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Ontinue does not | Ontinue publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pantherpanther.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 4 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Expelexpel.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Huntresshuntress.com | 57/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| WithSecurewithsecure.com | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Blumirablumira.com | 30/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.com | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cynetcynet.com | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Anvilogicanvilogic.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Arctic Wolfarcticwolf.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Atomicorp Atomic OSSECatomicorp.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Uptycsuptycs.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Deepwatchdeepwatch.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.