Transparency alternatives to Expel
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Expel. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Expel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Expel has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Expel” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Expel | Found at Expel, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huntresshuntress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Huntress | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trend Micro | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Ontinueontinue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ontinue | 43/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Pantherpanther.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Panther | 43/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Blumirablumira.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blumira | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Corelightcorelight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corelight | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Anvilogicanvilogic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anvilogic | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Arctic Wolfarcticwolf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arctic Wolf | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Atomicorp Atomic OSSECatomicorp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Uptycsuptycs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptycs | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| CrowdSeccrowdsec.netSee also Transparency alternatives to CrowdSec | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Filigranfiligran.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Filigran | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.