Alternatives to Gigamon
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Gigamon does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Gigamon on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Gigamon has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Gigamon does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Gigamon does not | Gigamon publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pantherpanther.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Expelexpel.com | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Huntresshuntress.com | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Corelightcorelight.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Blumirablumira.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Corocoro.net | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Stellar Cyberstellarcyber.ai | 13/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Red Canaryredcanary.com | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.com | 39/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Vectra AIvectra.ai | 39/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Filigranfiligran.io | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cynetcynet.com | 30/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.