SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Cyberwatch

Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cyberwatch does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Cyberwatch on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cyberwatch has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Cyberwatch does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Cyberwatch does notCyberwatch publishes, and they do not
Expelexpel.com 61/100 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +5 nothing Compare
Huntresshuntress.com 57/100 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Pantherpanther.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Corelightcorelight.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Red Canaryredcanary.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Trend Microtrendmicro.com 39/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Gigamongigamon.com 35/100 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Blumirablumira.com 30/100 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
Vectra AIvectra.ai 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Filigranfiligran.io 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Corocoro.net 30/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Cybereasoncybereason.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.