SaaS Ranking
Menu

Red Canary: what they publish

redcanary.com · SIEM and security operations · checked 2026-10-14

22/100FBand F

Rank 24 of 39 in SIEM and security operations, where the median is 22.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-14. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

3 days since the newest dated result, 3 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Red Canary

redcanary.com · SIEM and security operations

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
F 22of 100 Rank 24 of 39

Published commitments2 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-14. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Red Canary has no such document.

Where Red Canary sits in SIEM and security operations

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C2 5%
  4. D3 8%
  5. E13 33%
  6. F21 54%
39 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Red Canary is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Red Canary states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://redcanary.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://redcanary.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://redcanary.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://redcanary.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://redcanary.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://redcanary.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://redcanary.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in SIEM and security operations: 8 of 39 companies

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://redcanary.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://redcanary.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://redcanary.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://redcanary.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://redcanary.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://redcanary.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in SIEM and security operations: 3 of 39 companies

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://compliance.zscaler.com/ · checked 2026-10-14

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/security – found, but behind a sign-in
  2. https://redcanary.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://redcanary.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://redcanary.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://redcanary.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://redcanary.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://redcanary.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data location stated in SIEM and security operations: 8 of 39 companies

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://redcanary.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://redcanary.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://redcanary.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://redcanary.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in SIEM and security operations: 8 of 40 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: cms.zscaler.com, consent.app.relyance.ai, fonts.googleapis.com, info.zscaler.com, js.storylane.io, www.googletagmanager.com, www.zscaler.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in SIEM and security operations: 1 of 41 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://redcanary.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://redcanary.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://redcanary.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://redcanary.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://redcanary.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://redcanary.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://redcanary.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in SIEM and security operations: 6 of 39 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://redcanary.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://redcanary.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://redcanary.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://redcanary.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://redcanary.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in SIEM and security operations: 4 of 39 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in SIEM and security operations: 7 of 39 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://redcanary.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://redcanary.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://redcanary.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://redcanary.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://redcanary.com/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://redcanary.com/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://redcanary.com/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in SIEM and security operations: 19 of 39 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 3
✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.redcanary.com/ · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Status page with history in SIEM and security operations: 9 of 41 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

Source: https://redcanary.com/ · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in SIEM and security operations: 31 of 42 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page CSA STAR (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), Cyber Essentials (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), HIPAA (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), HITRUST CSF (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO 22301 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27017 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27018 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27701 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), PCI DSS (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), TISAX (unclear from the sentence). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 13 exact wordings

    View Zscaler's Website Certifications SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO 22301 CSA STAR Level 2 FIPS 140-2 SOC 3 ISO/IEC 27017:2015 FIPS 140-3 ISO/IEC 27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-Design Pl

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    O/IEC 27017:2015 FIPS 140-3 ISO/IEC 27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-Design Pledge HIPAA ISO/IEC 27701 C5 Cyber Essentials Plus HITRUST GDPR TISAX ISMAP PCI DSS CCCS - CSP ITS DCSO Security Assessment NIST....

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    l 2 FIPS 140-2 SOC 3 ISO/IEC 27017:2015 FIPS 140-3 ISO/IEC 27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-Design Pledge HIPAA ISO/IEC 27701 C5 Cyber Essentials Plus HITRUST GDPR TISAX ISMAP PCI DSS CCCS - CSP ITS DCSO Se...

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    140-3 ISO/IEC 27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-Design Pledge HIPAA ISO/IEC 27701 C5 Cyber Essentials Plus HITRUST GDPR TISAX ISMAP PCI DSS CCCS - CSP ITS DCSO Security Assessment NIST 800-53 Rev.

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    View Zscaler's Website Certifications SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO 22301 CSA STAR Level 2 FIPS 140-2 SOC 3 ISO/IEC 27017:2015 FIPS 140-3 ISO/IEC 27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    e built on foundational programs focusing on data protection and regulatory requirements, including ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, and various others, depending on the specific Zscaler product and custo...

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    x27;s Website Certifications SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO 22301 CSA STAR Level 2 FIPS 140-2 SOC 3 ISO/IEC 27017:2015 FIPS 140-3 ISO/IEC 27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-Design Pledge HIPAA ISO/IEC 27701 C...

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    OC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO 22301 CSA STAR Level 2 FIPS 140-2 SOC 3 ISO/IEC 27017:2015 FIPS 140-3 ISO/IEC 27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-Design Pledge HIPAA ISO/IEC 27701 C5 Cyber Essentials Plus HITRUS...

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    foundational programs focusing on data protection and regulatory requirements, including ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, and various others, depending on the specific Zscaler product and customer needs.

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    CISA: Secure-by-Design Pledge HIPAA ISO/IEC 27701 C5 Cyber Essentials Plus HITRUST GDPR TISAX ISMAP PCI DSS CCCS - CSP ITS DCSO Security Assessment NIST 800-53 Rev.

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    l programs focusing on data protection and regulatory requirements, including ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, and various others, depending on the specific Zscaler product and customer needs.

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    View Zscaler's Website Certifications SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO 22301 CSA STAR Level 2 FIPS 140-2 SOC 3 ISO/IEC 27017:2015 FIPS 140-3 ISO/

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

    27018:2019 CISA: Secure-by-Design Pledge HIPAA ISO/IEC 27701 C5 Cyber Essentials Plus HITRUST GDPR TISAX ISMAP PCI DSS CCCS - CSP ITS DCSO Security Assessment NIST 800-53 Rev.

    Read at https://compliance.zscaler.com/

Source: https://compliance.zscaler.com/ · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Certifications named in SIEM and security operations: 19 of 40 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-07: 22 of 1002026-10-14: 22 of 100 2026-10-07 2026-10-14
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Red Canary in: 22 (2026-10-07), 22 (2026-10-14).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Red Canary

3 found · 9 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-14.

Investigate 9 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  3. Data location stated

    Which locations apply to our primary data, backups and support access? Which region can we select for this plan?

    Inspect this check
  4. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  5. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  6. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  7. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  8. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check
  9. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.