SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Bodyguard

Other Social media management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Bodyguard does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Bodyguard on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Bodyguard has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Bodyguard does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Bodyguard does notBodyguard publishes, and they do not
Dash Socialdashsocial.com 78/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Sprout Socialsproutsocial.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Hootsuitehootsuite.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Statusbrewstatusbrew.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Agorapulseagorapulse.com 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Sprinklrsprinklr.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ContentStudiocontentstudio.io 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Emplifiemplifi.io 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Publerpubler.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Brandwatchbrandwatch.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Vista Socialvistasocial.com 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Khoroskhoros.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.