Transparency alternatives to Dash Social
Other Social media management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Dash Social. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Dash Social on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dash Social has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Dash Social” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Dash Social | Found at Dash Social, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agorapulseagorapulse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agorapulse | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Sprout Socialsproutsocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sprout Social | 74/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Hootsuitehootsuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hootsuite | 70/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Statusbrewstatusbrew.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Statusbrew | 70/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Emplifiemplifi.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Emplifi | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Sprinklrsprinklr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sprinklr | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Khoroskhoros.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Khoros | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Laterlater.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Later | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| CoSchedulecoschedule.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CoSchedule | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Swat.ioswat.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Swat.io | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Publerpubler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Publer | 48/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Brandwatchbrandwatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandwatch | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.