Transparency alternatives to Agorapulse
Other Social media management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Agorapulse. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Agorapulse on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Agorapulse has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Agorapulse” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Agorapulse | Found at Agorapulse, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dash Socialdashsocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dash Social | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hootsuitehootsuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hootsuite | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Sprout Socialsproutsocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sprout Social | 74/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Statusbrewstatusbrew.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Statusbrew | 70/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Brandwatchbrandwatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandwatch | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Emplifiemplifi.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Emplifi | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Sprinklrsprinklr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sprinklr | 43/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Vista Socialvistasocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vista Social | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Loomlyloomly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loomly | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Planableplanable.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Planable | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Publerpubler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Publer | 48/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Laterlater.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Later | 43/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.