SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to BillingPlatform

Other Subscription management and billing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that BillingPlatform does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

9 shown of 9 that differ from BillingPlatform on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

BillingPlatform has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and BillingPlatform does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and BillingPlatform does notBillingPlatform publishes, and they do not
Dodo Paymentsdodopayments.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Subprocessor list Compare
SubJoltsubjolt.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Polarpolar.sh 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Cerillioncerillion.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Autumnuseautumn.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
AdvantageCSadvantagecs.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Upmindupmind.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
OneBillonebillsoftware.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Oak Softwareoaksoftware.co.uk 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.