SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Oak Software

Other Subscription management and billing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Oak Software. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

9 shown of 9 that differ from Oak Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Oak Software has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Oak Software” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Oak SoftwareFound at Oak Software, not found there
SubJoltsubjolt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SubJolt 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Dodo Paymentsdodopayments.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dodo Payments 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Polarpolar.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Polar 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Cerillioncerillion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerillion 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Autumnuseautumn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Autumn 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Upmindupmind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Upmind 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
BillingPlatformbillingplatform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BillingPlatform 9/100 1 Notice before subprocessors change 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
OneBillonebillsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OneBill 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
AdvantageCSadvantagecs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AdvantageCS 4/100 1 Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.