Transparency alternatives to Dun & Bradstreet
Other Supply chain risk vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Dun & Bradstreet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Dun & Bradstreet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dun & Bradstreet has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Dun & Bradstreet” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Dun & Bradstreet | Found at Dun & Bradstreet, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resilincresilinc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Resilinc | 74/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Assentassent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assent | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Versoverso.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Verso | 50/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Circulorcirculor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Circulor | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| LexisNexis Riskrisk.lexisnexis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LexisNexis Risk | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Sayarisayari.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sayari | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Avettaavetta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avetta | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| TrusTracetrustrace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrusTrace | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Everstreameverstream.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Everstream | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Exigerexiger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Exiger | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Everledgereverledger.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Everledger | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| ISNisnetworld.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ISN | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.