SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Resilinc

Other Supply chain risk vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Resilinc. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from Resilinc on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Resilinc has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Resilinc” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ResilincFound at Resilinc, not found there
Versoverso.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Verso 50/100 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Avettaavetta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avetta 35/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Assentassent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assent 52/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
TrusTracetrustrace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrusTrace 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Everledgereverledger.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Everledger 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 Compare
Circulorcirculor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Circulor 39/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
LexisNexis Riskrisk.lexisnexis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LexisNexis Risk 39/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Sayarisayari.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sayari 30/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Everstreameverstream.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Everstream 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Exigerexiger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Exiger 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Dun & Bradstreetdnb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dun & Bradstreet 22/100 1 Status page with history 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Achillesachilles.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Achilles 17/100 1 Status page with history 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.