SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Lexware

Other Tax compliance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lexware. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Lexware on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Lexware has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Lexware” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at LexwareFound at Lexware, not found there
Avalaraavalara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avalara 70/100 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
TaxJartaxjar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TaxJar 65/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Quadernoquaderno.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Quaderno 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Fintuafintua.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fintua 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Kontistkontist.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kontist 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Taxandotaxando.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Taxando 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Billitbillit.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Billit 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Amavatamavat.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Amavat 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Amazon VAT Partnertaxually.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amazon VAT Partner 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Steuerbotsteuerbot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Steuerbot 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Tungsten Automationtungstenautomation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tungsten Automation 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Countxcountx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Countx 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.