SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Owl Practice

Other Telehealth platforms vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Owl Practice. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Owl Practice on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Owl Practice has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Owl Practice” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Owl PracticeFound at Owl Practice, not found there
Janejane.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Jane 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Halaxyhalaxy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Halaxy 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Zandazandahealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zanda 39/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Dermanosticdermanostic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dermanostic 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
smart medicationsmart-medication.euSee also Transparency alternatives to smart medication 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Arztkonsultationarztkonsultation.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Arztkonsultation 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Sanvartissanvartis.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Sanvartis 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Doxy.medoxy.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Doxy.me 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Sprucesprucehealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spruce 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Teladoc Healthteladochealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teladoc Health 26/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Corepluscorepluspm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coreplus 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Vseevsee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vsee 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.