SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to XQual

Other Test automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that XQual does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 42 that differ from XQual on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

XQual has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and XQual does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and XQual does notXQual publishes, and they do not
Cypresscypress.io 65/100 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Replicated Compatibility Matrixreplicated.com 52/100 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Katalonkatalon.com 48/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Testsigmatestsigma.com 48/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Applitoolsapplitools.com 43/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Endtestendtest.io 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
ACCELQaccelq.com 39/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Global App Testingglobalapptesting.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
PractiTestpractitest.com 39/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Rainforest QArainforestqa.com 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Allure TestOpsqameta.io 30/100 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Functionizefunctionize.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.