SaaS Ranking

Replicated Compatibility Matrix

replicated.com · Test automation · checked 2026-09-15

52/100DBand D

Rank 2 of 47 in Test automation, where the median is 26.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for Replicated Compatibility Matrix on 2026-09-15. We found 7 with a source and did not find 5 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 52 out of 100, band D.

Overview

0 days since the newest finding, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Replicated Compatibility Matrix

replicated.com · Test automation

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 52of 100 Rank 2 of 47

Published commitments5 of 9 found

Measured behaviour2 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-15. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Replicated Compatibility Matrix has no such document.

Where Replicated Compatibility Matrix sits in Test automation

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C1 2%
  4. D6 13%
  5. E19 40%
  6. F21 45%
47 vendors with a score; 2 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Replicated Compatibility Matrix is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What they state

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-15.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://replicated.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://replicated.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://replicated.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://replicated.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://replicated.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://replicated.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://replicated.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://replicated.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-15.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://replicated.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://replicated.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://replicated.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://replicated.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://replicated.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://replicated.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://replicated.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-15.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://replicated.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: ajax.googleapis.com, cdn.embedly.com, cdn.prod.website-files.com, d3e54v103j8qbb.cloudfront.net, fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com, googleads.g.doubleclick.net, i.ytimg.com, jnn-pa.googleapis.com, region1.analytics.google.com, region1.google-analytics.com, static.doubleclick.net, stats.g.doubleclick.net, www.google-analytics.com, www.google.com, www.google.de, www.googletagmanager.com, www.youtube.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-15.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://replicated.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://replicated.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://replicated.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://replicated.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://replicated.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://replicated.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://replicated.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://replicated.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-15.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://replicated.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://replicated.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://replicated.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://replicated.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://replicated.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://replicated.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 7

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Netherlands, United States.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    The Replicated Compatibility Matrix Solution (CMX) uses application and database servers located in the Netherlands using Hetzner (https://www.hetzner.com/).

    Read at https://www.replicated.com/privacy

    The Replicated Distribution Solution and database servers are located in the United States using Amazon Web Services and Google Compute Engine services.

    Read at https://www.replicated.com/privacy

Source: https://www.replicated.com/privacy · checked 2026-09-15

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.replicated.com/ · checked 2026-09-15

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.replicated.com/pricing · checked 2026-09-15

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

Source: https://replicated.com/ · checked 2026-09-15

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

Source: https://www.replicated.com/security · checked 2026-09-15

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://replicated.com/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-09-15

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.replicated.com/privacy · checked 2026-09-15

History

100 0 2026-09-14: 52 of 1002026-09-15: 52 of 100 2026-09-14 2026-09-15
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Replicated Compatibility Matrix in: 52 (2026-09-14), 52 (2026-09-15).

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.