SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Group-IB

Other Threat intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Group-IB does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Group-IB on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Group-IB has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Group-IB does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Group-IB does notGroup-IB publishes, and they do not
Dataminrdataminr.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Feedly Threat Intelligencefeedly.com 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Intezerintezer.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
IPinfoipinfo.io 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Anomalianomali.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Censyscensys.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cywarecyware.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Pulsedivepulsedive.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
GreyNoisegreynoise.io 30/100 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
AbuseIPDBabuseipdb.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Cyblecyble.com 22/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Recorded Futurerecordedfuture.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.