SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Hybrid Analysis

Other Threat intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Hybrid Analysis does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Hybrid Analysis on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Hybrid Analysis has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Hybrid Analysis does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Hybrid Analysis does notHybrid Analysis publishes, and they do not
Dataminrdataminr.com 70/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Feedly Threat Intelligencefeedly.com 48/100 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 nothing Compare
Intezerintezer.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Anomalianomali.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Cywarecyware.com 39/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Censyscensys.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
IPinfoipinfo.io 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Pulsedivepulsedive.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
GreyNoisegreynoise.io 30/100 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Cyblecyble.com 22/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Intel 471intel471.com 26/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Recorded Futurerecordedfuture.com 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.