SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to KELA

Other Threat intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that KELA does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from KELA on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

KELA has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and KELA does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and KELA does notKELA publishes, and they do not
Dataminrdataminr.com 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Feedly Threat Intelligencefeedly.com 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Intezerintezer.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Anomalianomali.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Censyscensys.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cywarecyware.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
IPinfoipinfo.io 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Pulsedivepulsedive.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
GreyNoisegreynoise.io 30/100 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Cyblecyble.com 22/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Recorded Futurerecordedfuture.com 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Intel 471intel471.com 26/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.