SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to POEditor

Other Translation and localization vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that POEditor does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from POEditor on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

POEditor has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and POEditor does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and POEditor does notPOEditor publishes, and they do not
Lokaliselokalise.com 87/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Transifextransifex.com 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Bureau Worksbureauworks.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
LingoHublingohub.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Crowdincrowdin.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 Public pricing Compare
Locizelocize.com 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 nothing Compare
Smartcatsmartcat.com 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Traduoratraduora.co 43/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Phrasephrase.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Wordbeewordbee.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Redokunredokun.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Gridlygridly.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.