Alternatives to User Interviews
Other User research and testing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that User Interviews does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from User Interviews on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
User Interviews has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and User Interviews does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and User Interviews does not | User Interviews publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sprigsprig.com | 52/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Ballparkballparkhq.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Graingrain.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| UserTestingusertesting.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| UserZoomuserzoom.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Lyssnalyssna.com | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Preelypreely.com | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 10 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +7 | Compare |
| Attention Insightattentioninsight.com | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Great Questiongreatquestion.co | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Aureliusaureliuslab.com | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Useberryuseberry.com | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Heliohelio.app | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.