Alternatives to Great Question
Other User research and testing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Great Question does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Great Question on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Great Question has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Great Question does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Great Question does not | Great Question publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sprigsprig.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Attention Insightattentioninsight.com | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Loop11loop11.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Aureliusaureliuslab.com | 52/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ballparkballparkhq.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Graingrain.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Useberryuseberry.com | 43/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lyssnalyssna.com | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Heliohelio.app | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| UXArmyuxarmy.com | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Userbrainuserbrain.com | 35/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Condenscondens.io | 30/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.