Transparency alternatives to Talkatoo
Other Veterinary practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Talkatoo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Talkatoo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Talkatoo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Talkatoo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Talkatoo | Found at Talkatoo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weavegetweave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weave | 74/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| IDEXXidexx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDEXX | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Provet Cloudprovet.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to Provet Cloud | 41/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ezyVetezyvet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ezyVet | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vetstoriavetstoria.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vetstoria | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| PetDeskpetdesk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PetDesk | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| NaVetornavetor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NaVetor | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vetspirevetspire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vetspire | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CoVetco.vetSee also Transparency alternatives to CoVet | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vet Radarvetradar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vet Radar | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Shepherdshepherd.vetSee also Transparency alternatives to Shepherd | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Digitaildigitail.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Digitail | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.