SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Shepherd

Other Veterinary practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Shepherd does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Shepherd on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Shepherd has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Shepherd does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Shepherd does notShepherd publishes, and they do not
ezyVetezyvet.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Vetstoriavetstoria.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Provet Cloudprovet.cloud 41/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
IDEXXidexx.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
NaVetornavetor.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
VETportvetport.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
PetDeskpetdesk.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Digitaildigitail.io 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Onward Vetonwardvet.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Talkatootalkatoo.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Vetologyvetology.ai 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ClienTraxclientrax.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.