SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Black Duck

Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Black Duck does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Black Duck on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Black Duck has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Black Duck does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Black Duck does notBlack Duck publishes, and they do not
Invictiinvicti.com 83/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 1 Status page with history Compare
Snyksnyk.io 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Intruderintruder.io 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Wizwiz.io 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Detectifydetectify.com 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Holm Securityholmsecurity.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Mendmend.io 50/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Semgrepsemgrep.dev 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
SonarSourcesonarsource.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Acunetixacunetix.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Status page with history Compare
JFrogjfrog.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Status page with history Compare
StackHawkstackhawk.com 30/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.