Alternatives to Intruder
Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Intruder does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Intruder on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Intruder has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Intruder does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Intruder does not | Intruder publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invictiinvicti.com | 83/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Snyksnyk.io | 61/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Wizwiz.io | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Holm Securityholmsecurity.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Aqua Securityaquasec.com | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| StackHawkstackhawk.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Mendmend.io | 50/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Semgrepsemgrep.dev | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Detectifydetectify.com | 43/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Acunetixacunetix.com | 39/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| JFrogjfrog.com | 39/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Nucleus Securitynucleussec.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.