SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Pentera

Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pentera does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Pentera on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pentera has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Pentera does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Pentera does notPentera publishes, and they do not
Invictiinvicti.com 83/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Snyksnyk.io 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Wizwiz.io 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Intruderintruder.io 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Holm Securityholmsecurity.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Mendmend.io 50/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Semgrepsemgrep.dev 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Detectifydetectify.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Acunetixacunetix.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Certifications named Compare
JFrogjfrog.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Certifications named Compare
StackHawkstackhawk.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
SonarSourcesonarsource.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.