SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Qualys

Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Qualys does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Qualys on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Qualys has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Qualys does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Qualys does notQualys publishes, and they do not
Invictiinvicti.com 83/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 1 Status page with history Compare
Rapid7rapid7.com 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Snyksnyk.io 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Intruderintruder.io 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Wizwiz.io 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Holm Securityholmsecurity.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mendmend.io 50/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
SonarSourcesonarsource.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Detectifydetectify.com 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Semgrepsemgrep.dev 48/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Veracodeveracode.com 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Acunetixacunetix.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.