Transparency alternatives to CognitOps
Other Warehouse management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CognitOps does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from CognitOps on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
CognitOps has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and CognitOps does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and CognitOps does not | CognitOps publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EasyEcomeasyecom.io | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Infoplusinfopluscommerce.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Flowspaceflow.space | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fulfil.iofulfil.io | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Canary7canary7.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Balloon Oneballoonone.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Datapel WMSdatapel.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Generixgenerixgroup.com | 30/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Logiwalogiwa.com | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| AutoStoreautostoresystem.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Optioryxoptioryx.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bitlog WMSbitlogwms.com | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.