SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Mitratech

Other Whistleblowing systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Mitratech does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Mitratech on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mitratech has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Mitratech does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Mitratech does notMitratech publishes, and they do not
FaceUpfaceup.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Whispliwhispli.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
EQS Groupeqs.com 22/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Ethenagoethena.com 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing nothing Compare
NAVEXnavex.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
Signalistsignalist.de 29/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Convercentconvercent.com 13/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Case IQcaseiq.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ethicoethico.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ethicontrolethicontrol.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Integrity Lineintegrityline.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Whistleblower Softwarewhistleblowersoftware.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.