SaaS Ranking
Menu

Tempo

tempo.io · Workforce and shift management · checked 2026-09-16

35/100EBand E

Rank 19 of 85 in Workforce and shift management, where the median is 17.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for Tempo on 2026-09-16. We found 4 with a source and did not find 8 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 35 out of 100, band E.

Overview

0 days since the newest finding, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Tempo

tempo.io · Workforce and shift management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
E 35of 100 Rank 19 of 85

Published commitments3 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-16. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Tempo has no such document.

Where Tempo sits in Workforce and shift management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 1%
  3. C2 2%
  4. D6 7%
  5. E25 29%
  6. F51 60%
85 vendors with a score; 2 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Tempo is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What they state

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://trust.tempo.io/?itemUid=c4223a81-5840-4e11-ac9f-2b812794a67e&source=click · checked 2026-09-16

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://tempo.io/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tempo.io/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://tempo.io/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tempo.io/data-processing-agreement – found, but behind a sign-in
  5. https://tempo.io/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tempo.io/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tempo.io/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://tempo.io/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://trust.tempo.io/ · checked 2026-09-16

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://tempo.io/security – found, but behind a sign-in
  2. https://tempo.io/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://tempo.io/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tempo.io/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://tempo.io/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://tempo.io/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tempo.io/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.tempo.io/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://tempo.io/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://tempo.io.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-16.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://tempo.io/ – third-party requests before any interaction: api.segment.io, assets.ubembed.com, cdn.segment.com, config.trackingplan.com, consent.cookiebot.com, consentcdn.cookiebot.com, dee7e7cd2a684e558dd27867b1d34762.js.ubembed.com, dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com, images.ctfassets.net, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://tempo.io/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tempo.io/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://tempo.io/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tempo.io/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://tempo.io/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tempo.io/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tempo.io/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://tempo.io/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://tempo.io/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tempo.io/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://tempo.io/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tempo.io/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://tempo.io/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tempo.io/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-16.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://tempo.io/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-16.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://tempo.io/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tempo.io/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://tempo.io/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://tempo.io/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://tempo.io/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tempo.io/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tempo.io/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 4
✓

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://www.tempo.io/subprocessors · checked 2026-09-16

✓

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.tempo.io/pricing/jira-time-tracking · checked 2026-09-16

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 63072000 seconds (730 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=63072000

    Read at https://tempo.io/

Source: https://tempo.io/ · checked 2026-09-16

✓

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page CSA STAR (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), HIPAA, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701 (unclear from the sentence), PCI DSS (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II. The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 7 exact wordings

    iance SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 SoA ISO/IEC 27701 GDPR CCPA DORA HIPAA SOC 1 PCI DSS CSA STAR Level 1 VPAT Tempo is reviewed and trusted by Cisco Airbus Netflix Slack Oracle Airbnb Docu...

    Read at https://trust.tempo.io/

    Compliance SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 SoA ISO/IEC 27701 GDPR CCPA DORA HIPAA SOC 1 PCI DSS CSA STAR Level 1 VPAT Tempo is reviewed and trusted by Cisco Airbus Netflix Slack Ora

    Read at https://trust.tempo.io/

    Compliance SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 SoA ISO/IEC 27701 GDPR CCPA DORA HIPAA SOC 1 PCI DSS CSA STAR Level 1 VPAT Tempo is r

    Read at https://trust.tempo.io/

    Compliance SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 SoA ISO/IEC 27701 GDPR CCPA DORA HIPAA SOC 1 PCI DSS CSA STAR Level 1 VPAT Tempo is reviewed and trusted by Cisco Air

    Read at https://trust.tempo.io/

    Compliance SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 SoA ISO/IEC 27701 GDPR CCPA DORA HIPAA SOC 1 PCI DSS CSA STAR Level 1 VPAT Tempo is reviewed and trusted by Cisco Airbus Netflix Slack Oracle Airbnb...

    Read at https://trust.tempo.io/

    c Private Get access Bulk download Featured Documents DOCUMENTS Security & Privacy Overview REPORTS SOC 2 Report PRIVACY & DATA PROTECTION Cloud Hosting Locations & Data Residency COMPLIANCE ISO/IEC 2...

    Read at https://trust.tempo.io/

    Compliance SOC 2 Type 2 ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 SoA ISO/IEC 27701 GDPR CCPA DORA HIPAA SOC 1 PCI DSS CSA STAR Le

    Read at https://trust.tempo.io/

Source: https://trust.tempo.io/ · checked 2026-09-16

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.