Transparency alternatives to Milestone Systems
Other Physical access control and video security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Milestone Systems. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from Milestone Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Milestone Systems has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Milestone Systems” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Milestone Systems | Found at Milestone Systems, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kisigetkisi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kisi | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Verkadaverkada.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Verkada | 59/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SmartRentsmartrent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRent | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Genetecgenetec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genetec | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| ButterflyMXbutterflymx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ButterflyMX | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Geneagetgenea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genea | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rhombusrhombus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rhombus | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| ProdataKeyprodatakey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProdataKey | 29/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Avigilonavigilon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avigilon | 27/100 | 1 Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Ambient.aiambient.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Ambient.ai | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Spot AIspot.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Spot AI | 26/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Brivobrivo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brivo | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.