Transparency alternatives to AuditFile
Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at AuditFile. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 70 that differ from AuditFile on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
AuditFile has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at AuditFile” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at AuditFile | Found at AuditFile, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acodeiacodei.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acodei | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| AccountKitaccount-kit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccountKit | 70/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Odooodoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Odoo | 39/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Clear Booksclearbooks.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Clear Books | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| FreeAgentfreeagent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FreeAgent | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Candiscandis.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Candis | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Fortnoxfortnox.seSee also Transparency alternatives to Fortnox | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Papierkrampapierkram.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Papierkram | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Tripletextripletex.noSee also Transparency alternatives to Tripletex | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Vismavisma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Visma | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| sevDesksevdesk.deSee also Transparency alternatives to sevDesk | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Zoho Bookszoho.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zoho Books | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.