Transparency alternatives to Lexware Office
Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lexware Office. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 70 that differ from Lexware Office on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lexware Office has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Lexware Office” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Lexware Office | Found at Lexware Office, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AccountKitaccount-kit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccountKit | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Odooodoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Odoo | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Acodeiacodei.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acodei | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Zervantzervant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zervant | 36/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Clear Booksclearbooks.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Clear Books | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| FreeAgentfreeagent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FreeAgent | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Billomatbillomat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Billomat | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Candiscandis.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Candis | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Fortnoxfortnox.seSee also Transparency alternatives to Fortnox | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Papierkrampapierkram.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Papierkram | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Tripletextripletex.noSee also Transparency alternatives to Tripletex | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Vismavisma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Visma | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.