SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Papierkram

Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Papierkram does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Papierkram on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Papierkram has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Papierkram does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Papierkram does notPapierkram publishes, and they do not
Odooodoo.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
FreeAgentfreeagent.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Xeroxero.com 42/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Billbill.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Lexware Officelexware-office.de 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Clear Booksclearbooks.co.uk 30/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Meliomelio.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Wavewaveapps.com 30/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
QuickBooksquickbooks.intuit.com 27/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Billomatbillomat.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Fortnoxfortnox.se 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Holdedholded.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.