Transparency alternatives to APIsec
Other API security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at APIsec. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 20 that differ from APIsec on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
APIsec has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at APIsec” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at APIsec | Found at APIsec, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cequencecequence.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Cequence | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Pyntpynt.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pynt | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| PortSwiggerportswigger.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PortSwigger | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| ThreatXthreatx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ThreatX | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Salt Securitysalt.securitySee also Transparency alternatives to Salt Security | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Beagle Securitybeaglesecurity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beagle Security | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| 42Crunch42crunch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 42Crunch | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Reblazereblaze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reblaze | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| ZAPzaproxy.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to ZAP | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| FireTailfiretail.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to FireTail | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Levo.ailevo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Levo.ai | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Approovapproov.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Approov | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.