Transparency alternatives to Cequence
Other API security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Cequence. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 18 that differ from Cequence on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cequence has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Cequence” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Cequence | Found at Cequence, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt Securitysalt.securitySee also Transparency alternatives to Salt Security | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| PortSwiggerportswigger.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PortSwigger | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FireTailfiretail.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to FireTail | 26/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Beagle Securitybeaglesecurity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beagle Security | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Levo.ailevo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Levo.ai | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ThreatXthreatx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ThreatX | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 42Crunch42crunch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 42Crunch | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Reblazereblaze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reblaze | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Cloudbriccloudbric.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudbric | 4/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| ZAPzaproxy.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to ZAP | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Pyntpynt.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pynt | 30/100 | nothing we found there and not here | nothing | Compare |
| Approovapproov.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Approov | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.