SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to FireTail

Other API security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FireTail does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from FireTail on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FireTail has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and FireTail does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and FireTail does notFireTail publishes, and they do not
42Crunch42crunch.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Subprocessor list Compare
APIsecapisec.ai 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Pyntpynt.io 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Beagle Securitybeaglesecurity.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Cequencecequence.ai 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
ThreatXthreatx.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Salt Securitysalt.security 35/100 1 Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Aptoriaptori.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Corshacorsha.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Levo.ailevo.ai 22/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Approovapproov.io 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Data Theoremdatatheorem.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Subprocessor list Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.