Transparency alternatives to Approov
Other API security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Approov. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 17 that differ from Approov on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Approov has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Approov” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Approov | Found at Approov, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PortSwiggerportswigger.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PortSwigger | 26/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Salt Securitysalt.securitySee also Transparency alternatives to Salt Security | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Cequencecequence.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Cequence | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Pyntpynt.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pynt | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Beagle Securitybeaglesecurity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beagle Security | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ThreatXthreatx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ThreatX | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FireTailfiretail.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to FireTail | 26/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | nothing | Compare |
| Levo.ailevo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Levo.ai | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 42Crunch42crunch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 42Crunch | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Reblazereblaze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reblaze | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cloudbriccloudbric.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudbric | 4/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ZAPzaproxy.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to ZAP | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.