Transparency alternatives to Knit
Other Workflow automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Knit does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Knit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Knit has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Knit does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Knit does not | Knit publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapierzapier.com | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Tray.aitray.ai | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Pipefypipefy.com | 59/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Boomiboomi.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Trigger.devtrigger.dev | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tallyfytallyfy.com | 48/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Celigoceligo.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| n8nn8n.io | 43/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Nangonango.dev | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Prismaticprismatic.io | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| UiPathuipath.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Workatoworkato.com | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.