Transparency alternatives to Trigger.dev
Other Workflow automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Trigger.dev does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Trigger.dev on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Trigger.dev has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Trigger.dev does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Trigger.dev does not | Trigger.dev publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celigoceligo.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Pipefypipefy.com | 59/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Boomiboomi.com | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Process Streetprocess.st | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Tallyfytallyfy.com | 48/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| n8nn8n.io | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Prismaticprismatic.io | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| UiPathuipath.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Zapierzapier.com | 65/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Mergemerge.dev | 61/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Tray.aitray.ai | 61/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Automation Anywhereautomationanywhere.com | 52/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.