SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Tray.ai

Other Workflow automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tray.ai does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Tray.ai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tray.ai has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Tray.ai does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Tray.ai does notTray.ai publishes, and they do not
n8nn8n.io 65/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Tallyfytallyfy.com 61/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Nangonango.dev 39/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
UiPathuipath.com 20/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
Zapierzapier.com 85/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Mergemerge.dev 61/100 1 Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Boomiboomi.com 52/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated Compare
Process Streetprocess.st 50/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
IFTTTifttt.com 45/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Prismaticprismatic.io 43/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Bardeenbardeen.ai 39/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Pabblypabbly.com 39/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.