SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Solvedio

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Solvedio. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Solvedio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Solvedio has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Solvedio” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SolvedioFound at Solvedio, not found there
Sorocosoroco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Soroco 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Temporaltemporal.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Temporal 39/100 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Signaviosignavio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signavio 35/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Kestra Cloudkestra.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kestra Cloud 30/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Flowableflowable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowable 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Viflowviflow.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Viflow 22/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Emakinemakin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Emakin 30/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Celoniscelonis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Celonis 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Decisionsdecisions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Decisions 17/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
SoftExpertsoftexpert.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftExpert 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Cardanitcardanit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cardanit 35/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Skanskan.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Skan 35/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.