SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Flowable

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Flowable. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Flowable on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Flowable has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Flowable” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at FlowableFound at Flowable, not found there
Sorocosoroco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Soroco 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
Temporaltemporal.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Temporal 39/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cardanitcardanit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cardanit 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Signaviosignavio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signavio 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Kestra Cloudkestra.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kestra Cloud 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Solvediosolvedio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Solvedio 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Fluxiconfluxicon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fluxicon 13/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Emakinemakin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Emakin 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Aureaaurea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aurea 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Qprqpr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qpr 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Skanskan.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Skan 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Viflowviflow.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Viflow 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.