SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Viflow

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Viflow does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Viflow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Viflow has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Viflow does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Viflow does notViflow publishes, and they do not
Sorocosoroco.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Skanskan.ai 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Temporaltemporal.io 35/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Signaviosignavio.com 35/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Aureaaurea.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Decisionsdecisions.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Flowableflowable.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Qprqpr.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mehrwerkmehrwerk.eu 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Apromoreapromore.org 17/100 1 Data location stated 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
KIEkie.apache.org 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Fluxiconfluxicon.com 13/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.