SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Signavio

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Signavio. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Signavio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Signavio has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Signavio” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SignavioFound at Signavio, not found there
Temporaltemporal.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Temporal 39/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sorocosoroco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Soroco 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cardanitcardanit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cardanit 35/100 1 Public pricing 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Kestra Cloudkestra.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kestra Cloud 30/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Flowableflowable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowable 26/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Skanskan.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Skan 22/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Solvediosolvedio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Solvedio 22/100 1 Public pricing 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Chronos Workflowchronosworkflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronos Workflow 17/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
CICOD Workflow Managercicod.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CICOD Workflow Manager 17/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Decisionsdecisions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Decisions 17/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
KIEkie.apache.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to KIE 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Fluxiconfluxicon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fluxicon 13/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.